There has been some controversy in the yoga world recently.
I follow a lot of yoga blogs, and there is always a topic du jour that takes
the yoga blogosphere by storm. I
have never previously commented on them because even if I sometimes find these
issues interesting, I do not see them being interesting to the readers of this
blog. But this current one is something that I think is important for everyone
to consider.
In a nutshell, the current
controversy revolves around John Friend and his “brand” of yoga – Anusara.
To make a long story short, many of his high-level teachers have stepped down,
and as of a few days ago, even
John has decided to take a break. For purposes of full disclosure, I did my
teacher training with someone who is Anusara certified, and I really respect
its teachings, but I am not, nor have ever tried to be, Anusara certified.
So why do I care? More importantly, why should you?
John Friend is/was the leader of a type of yoga that has
gone international. He owned the company as a sole proprietorship (the legal
implications of which are huge, but sadly, that is not the type of law I
practice, so I am not going to even pretend to be competent to comment on those
legal issues, but I would be curious about it, so leave some thoughts in the
comments if you know about this). This was his brand. Anusara teaches about opening
to grace. It teaches energetic anatomy and community. These are powerful
and beautiful teachings, but the man at the top admittedly had serious
interpersonal issues and is being accused of some fairly serious infractions. While
I have no personal knowledge of the veracity of the accusations, the appearance
of impropriety is something lawyers take very seriously.
John Friend is not the first spiritual-type leader to face
controversy for his personal actions. In fact, the list is fairly long, and
some refer to these people as “fallen gurus.” As leaders of a spiritual
community, their public lives revolve around particular teachings that their
personal lives rebel against on a daily basis. Some argue this is what makes
them such wonderful teachers – they can be compassionate and understanding of
the difficulties of the human condition.
At some level, we all do it. We do everything in our power
to hide the truth, sometimes having to even hide it from ourselves. It shocks
people to learn that I do not practice yoga every single day (unless the deep
breaths in the car count). I often talk to people who say one thing about how
they act, and the next day I see them acting in contravention of that
statement.
I am fascinated by this phenomenon. Is this how we can
believe that it
is always the other person who is being unreasonable? Is this how we can demonize
people for whom we find it difficult to have compassion? In the story about
John Friend, the accusations are that his inappropriate behavior was happening
for years, but no one said anything about it. I can only guess why people would
hide this information if it was true. But it is not the first time we have
heard about this. Institutions keep secrets. Loyalty, friendship, and the need
to keep the institution alive mean that it is easier to take care of the
problems “on the inside,” rather than shed light on them.
And this brings me to the legal profession. We are a
self-regulating profession. Lawyers have an ethical duty to report other
lawyers who violate the Rules of Professional Responsibility, but the
requirement that lawyers act at all times in ways that do not lead to an
appearance of impropriety never manifested. Judges must, but lawyers need not.
Is this just a recognition that none of us are perfect? Is
it a recognition that we are all going to make mistakes? The “fallen guru”
phenomenon, and the ostensibly hypocritical actions so many of us take might
actually be something different altogether. Real people recognize that which is
so difficult for them in their own lives. Therefore, they ask, and sometimes
demand, others to be “better” than them. But then they must hide their own
personal failings, begging their closest allies and friends not to tell anyone
about. And then, when it finally surfaces, entire institutions fall overnight.
No one can live with that guilt forever. No one can live
with those secrets forever. Perhaps this is why lawyers are not prohibited from
acting in ways that could lead to the appearance of impropriety. As a
profession, we did not want to force ourselves into that double bind, into that
shadowy existence. The lack of that requirement used to bother me, but with so
many of these hidden worlds coming to light, perhaps it is better not to force
people to pretend to be something they are not. Out in the open, we can nip
problems in the bud much faster.
The teachings of Anusra are wonderful. I do not know John
Friend, nor will I probably ever meet him, but sadly his story, whether true or
not, might destroy all that he worked to build all because he possibly felt the
need to be one person on the outside while living a private life in direct
contravention of his teachings. I find that incredibly sad and disheartening.
How do you notice this in the world?
Namaste!
©
Rebecca Stahl 2012, all rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment